What is interesting is that centralising specialist services drives quality through both a “hospital” effect, but also a “physician” effect. Teasing this out is difficult. Physicians who see more of a particular diagnosis or perform a specific procedure tend to achieve higher quality outcomes.[3], [4], [5] Hospital-based services (e.g., intensive care, pain management, respiratory care, and nursing care) play an increasingly greater role in quality as the average length of stay lengthens.[6]
In the end we all look for the great doctor in the great hospital, right? But without clear definitions of what quality is in the first place, it's hard to figure out where to go anyways...
[1] Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364-9.
[2] Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer
surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747-51.
[3] Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2327-40.
[4] Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Tranmer B, Feustel P, Waldman J, Shah D. Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York State. Stroke 1998;29:2292-7.
[5] Hannan EL, Siu AL, Kumar D, Kilburn H Jr, Chassin MR. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in
[6] Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000;283:1159-66.
No comments:
Post a Comment