In Massachusetts, Universal Coverage Strains Care - New York Times
Here was the initial outline I jotted:
- Our nation faces an unprecedented primary care shortage with or without reform
- Increasing health coverage for the uninsured could rapidly increase the future primary care supply gap from ~12k PCP-equivalent FTEs to ~29-68k PCP-equivalent FTEs by 2015 (equivalent to a 10-25% increase in today’s supply), and will add particular strains to the primary care system
- Even in the absence of reform, a shortage of ~12k FTEs (equivalent to a 5% increase in current supply) is projected by 2015
- To serve the 56 M projected uninsured in 2015, 17-56k additional FTEs would be needed, with additional strains on the system due to the unique demands of the uninsured
- Primary care shortages are driven by mismatches in supply and demand that are not immediately addressable through market forces
- Demand drivers include
- Total population growth
- Aging population
- Growing prevalence of chronic conditions
- Supply decreasing due to
- Difficult to ramp up supply: Requires 7 yrs of postgrad training before entering health system
- Compensation gap: Specialists paid 2-3 times more than PCPs
- Difficult to control lifestyle: desire for more “controllable lifestyle” with -2% YoY decline in family medicine residency entrants
- The case study of Massachusetts health reform provides key lessons to keep in mind – in particular, the critical need to address the initial demand surge as the newly insured enter the system, the risk of a “downward spiral” as PCPs become overstretched, and the need for transitional assistance to underserved areas
- The uninsured demand on primary care has specific implications – it will exacerbate the issue of underserved areas, and it will require a geographic redistribution of resources and an immediate surge in PC supply as the newly insured enter the system
No comments:
Post a Comment